Global AI Token Comparison
Global AI Token Plan comparison home

Zhipu Token Plan Pricing, Top-up, Deals & Official Entry

Zhipu GLM Token Plan compares official access, personal pricing from ¥118/mo, team plans and quarterly or annual deals, covering GLM Coding Plan API keys, credit quotas, 50% off-peak credit burn, MCP tools, reset limits, Claude Code or Cursor setup and how it differs from pay-as-you-go API billing across GLM-5.3, GLM-5-Turbo and GLM-4.7.

Token PlanGLM-5.3GLM Coding Plan
SubscriptionToken API

Zhipu Token Plan Latest Updates

Analysis

How to Buy Zhipu GLM Coding Plan? Lite vs Pro vs Max vs Team: Prices, Quota, Credit Burn and How to Choose

Zhipu GLM Coding Plan personal tiers run Lite ¥118, Pro ¥538 and Max ¥1078/mo with 20% off quarterly and 30% off annual; team plans start at ¥598/seat/mo. Quota is credit-based: Lite gets 2,000 credits/5h and 10,000/week, Pro 12,000/60,000, Max 28,000/140,000. GLM-5.3 burns credits at Input 6.9 / Output 24, about 50% more than GLM-4.7. This guide covers where to buy, how credits burn, and which tier fits your workload.

View all updates

Below is the complete pricing comparison for Zhipu Token Plan, covering 5 plan tiers, core model capabilities, quotas, and official entry. All data is sourced from the official website to help you decide whether it’s worth it.

Last updated：

Zhipu Token Plan Price Comparison: Core Models

GLM-5.3GLM-5-TurboGLM-4.7
GLM-5.3

Current flagship matching Claude Fable 5 on coding and agent ability, with 1M context and 128K output for stronger long-horizon and complex-environment performance; credit coefficients Input 6.9 / Cached 1.7 / Output 24—first choice for complex engineering and agentic coding.

GLM-5-Turbo

High-value flagship optimized for long complex tasks and agents with strong execution continuity; credit coefficients Input 5.7 / Cached 1.5 / Output 21—fits long chains and tool-heavy workflows.

GLM-4.7

Mature high-intelligence model for balanced chat, reasoning, and coding; credit coefficients Input 4.6 / Cached 1.2 / Output 16—the recommended daily workhorse for pacing credit burn.

Zhipu Token Plan Price Comparison: Plans

Lite
Lite
Price Comparison
¥118/mo
2,000 credits/5h · 10,000 credits/week
Auto monthly
¥118/mo
Auto quarterly
¥94.4/mo
Quarterly 20% off
Auto annual
¥82.6/mo
Annual 30% off
Usage
Personal entry tier with 2,000 credits per 5 hours and 10,000 per week—fits small repos and light iteration, not sustained heavy multi-project work.
Models
Full model list: GLM-5.3, GLM-5-Turbo, GLM-4.7—use GLM-4.7 daily and switch to GLM-5.3 for hard checkpoints.
Highlights
Web search, page read, and open-repo MCP cost 1.2 credits each, sharing the 5-hour/weekly pool with vision MCP; model calls burn 50% off-peak.
Works with Claude Code, OpenClaw, Kilo Code, and 20+ supported tools—good for individuals testing whether GLM + MCP fits their workflow.
Best for
Individual developers, light-to-medium AI coding users, and people trying an MCP-driven workflow first
Pro
Most popularRecommended
Price Comparison
¥538/mo
12,000 credits/5h · 60,000 credits/week
Auto monthly
¥538/mo
Auto quarterly
¥430.4/mo
Quarterly 20% off
Auto annual
¥376.6/mo
Annual 30% off
Usage
About 6× Lite quota: 12,000 credits per 5 hours and 60,000 per week—suitable as a daily primary coding subscription for most individuals.
Models
Earlier access to new flagship features with faster generation; the credit system covers web search, page read, open-repo, and vision MCP for serious search, reading, and repo tooling.
Highlights
Higher concurrency than Lite (Max > Pro > Lite); official guidance suggests Pro fits 1–2 parallel project-level agent workflows.
If you already code heavily with AI tools and want a stable search-read-edit loop, Pro is usually the most balanced personal tier.
Best for
Frequent individual developers, small teams, and users integrating MCP toolchains into daily work
Max
Heavy
Price Comparison
¥1078/mo
28,000 credits/5h · 140,000 credits/week
Auto monthly
¥1078/mo
Auto quarterly
¥862.4/mo
Quarterly 20% off
Auto annual
¥754.6/mo
Annual 30% off
Usage
Personal heavy tier: 28,000 credits per 5 hours and 140,000 per week—about 14× Lite—for deep work on larger repos and parallel projects.
Models
First access to new flagship models with peak-time priority; web search, page read, and open-repo MCP cost 1.2 credits each—use the model as a search-read-execute workbench.
Highlights
Fits long high-frequency coding with complex task chains and heavy tool use—the value is sustained pressure without constant quota anxiety.
If you often work on large repos, complex refactors, and long-context debugging, the practical gap versus Lite/Pro becomes very noticeable.
Best for
Heavy AI coding users, large project teams, and people running high-frequency MCP toolchain workflows
团队标准版
Per seat
Price Comparison
¥598/mo
2 seats min · 15,000 credits/5h/seat · 66,000 credits/week/seat
Auto monthly
¥598/mo/seat
Auto annual
¥538.20/mo/seat
Annual 10% off
Usage
Team billing is per seat with independent 5-hour and weekly credit quotas—not one shared pool; Standard offers 15,000 credits/5h and 66,000 credits/week per seat.
Models
Includes seat/permission management, usage dashboards, consolidated billing/invoicing, and data not used for training by default; overage at 90% of API list price with per-member caps.
Highlights
Same models: GLM-5.3, GLM-5-Turbo, GLM-4.7; web search, page read, and open-repo MCP cost 1.2 credits each, and vision MCP burns by GLM-4.6V coefficients.
Suited to teams doing daily work on medium repos; requires a team plan key (separate from personal keys); the purchasing admin does not occupy a seat by default.
Best for
Mid-size R&D teams needing seat governance and unified billing (2 seats minimum)
团队高级版
Per seat
Price Comparison
¥1198/mo
35,000 credits/5h/seat · 155,000 credits/week/seat
Auto monthly
¥1198/mo/seat
Auto annual
¥1078.20/mo/seat
Annual 10% off
Usage
Advanced offers 35,000 credits/5h and 155,000 credits/week per seat—about 2.3× Standard—for deep work on larger repos.
Models
Adds first access to new flagship models and peak-time resource priority on top of Standard governance, billing, data isolation, and overage.
Highlights
Web search, page read, and open-repo MCP cost 1.2 credits each; official guidance supports 2+ parallel project-level workflows with higher off-peak concurrency.
Cannot mix Standard and Advanced seats or upgrade Standard to Advanced mid-term; adding seats bills pro-rata for the remaining period.
Best for
Enterprise teams with high-concurrency, multi-project work needing peak-time guarantees

Zhipu Token Plan Price Comparison: Quota & Usage

Product type
Token Plan · Coding Plan
Official product line
GLM Coding Plan
5-hour limit
Lite 2,000 credits · Team Standard 15,000 credits/seat
Weekly limit
Lite 10,000 credits · Team Standard 66,000 credits/seat
Monthly limit
—

Zhipu Token Plan Price Comparison: Notes

  • Personal list: Lite ¥118, Pro ¥538, Max ¥1078/mo; quarterly 20% off, annual 30% off (Lite ≈ ¥94.4/mo quarterly, ¥82.6/mo annual). Team Standard ¥598/seat/mo, Advanced ¥1198/seat/mo, 2 seats minimum, annual 10% off (Standard ¥538.2, Advanced ¥1078.2).
  • Quota now uses credits: Lite 2,000/5h and 10,000/week; Pro 12,000/60,000; Max 28,000/140,000; Team Standard 15,000/66,000 and Advanced 35,000/155,000 per seat. Model calls burn 50% base credits off-peak; peak is Mon–Fri 14:00–18:00 UTC+8.
  • Credit coefficients: GLM-5.3 is Input 6.9 / Cached 1.7 / Output 24, GLM-5-Turbo 5.7 / 1.5 / 21, GLM-4.7 4.6 / 1.2 / 16; vision MCP (GLM-4.6V) 1.2 / 0.3 / 2.7, and web search, page read, open-repo MCP each 1.2 credits. Legacy GLM-5.2/GLM-5.1 calls auto-route to GLM-5.3.
  • Plans work only in supported tools with Coding base URLs (e.g. Claude Code: `https://open.bigmodel.cn/api/anthropic`); seat sharing or unsupported tools may trigger risk controls.
  • Team plans can enable overage at 90% of API list price (limited promo); personal plans pause until the next 5-hour/weekly reset and do not auto-charge account balance.

Zhipu Token Plan Price Comparison: Tools & Integration

Claude CodeOpenClawOpenCodeClineCursorKilo CodeRoo CodeCrushGooseFactory DroidGemini CLIGrok CLICherry StudioTRAECodeBuddy

Zhipu Token Plan Pricing, Top-up, Deals, Quota, Usage, Setup & Updates

AnalysisPublished Updated

Zhipu GLM Coding Plan (GLM-5.3) vs Open Platform API (GLM-5.2): Which Is Cheaper? Subscription vs Pay-as-You-Go Pricing, Quota and Scenarios

ZhipuGLM Coding PlanGLM-5.3GLM APIPrice ComparisonPay-as-You-Go

Zhipu charges for GLM through two separate systems: the GLM Coding Plan is a subscription that burns credits (personal ¥118–¥1078/mo, dual 5-hour and weekly quotas, 50% off-peak burn, flagship GLM-5.3 at Input 6.9 / Output 24 credits), while the Open Platform API bills per token (pricing-page flagship GLM-5.2 at ¥8/¥28, cache hit ¥2; GLM-5.3's standalone API price is not yet published). For heavy coding in Claude Code or Cursor the subscription wins by a wide margin; for low-frequency calls or backend services pay-as-you-go is cheaper. This comparison uses each side's latest flagship to cover price conversion, discount boundaries and key boundaries.

View more updates

Page published：

Zhipu Token Plan Pricing, Top-up, Deals & FAQ

AI Token Plan

Global AI Token Comparison

AI Token Plan is not just a collection of vendor links. It places 41+ domestic and international AI platforms into one comparison framework, covering 395+ model entries plus common plan types such as Token Plans, Coding Plans, IDE Tools and LLM APIs.

When you need to compare AI subscription pricing, coding plan quota, API usage cost or official deal entry points, AI Token Plan brings official prices, plan tiers, usage rules, model capabilities and tool integrations into one place, reducing the need to check multiple vendor sites manually.

Data is continuously organized as vendor pricing pages, plan pages and product documentation change, making the homepage a pricing comparison entry point while detail pages explain whether each vendor plan fits individual developers, team purchasing or long-term API usage.

Prices come from each platform's official site and may change at any time; the official price prevails.

© 2026 AI Token Plan · All rights reserved · First published June 18, 2026 · 64 days running · Sitemap