Zhipu Token Plan Pricing, Top-up, Deals & Updates | Article

Zhipu Token Plan subscription pricing. 5 tiers (GLM Coding Plan, from ¥118/mo/mo). with 2,000 credits/5h (Lite). GLM-5.3 and 2 more models. Claude Code, OpenClaw, OpenCode and 12 more tools integrations. Plan quotas, perks, and official entry—is it worth it?

41
Platforms
395+
Models
140+
IDE Tools
3
Zhipu Token Plan models
¥118/mo
Zhipu Token Plan entry price
View
Vendor details

GLM Latest Updates

How to Buy Zhipu GLM Coding Plan? Lite vs Pro vs Max vs Team: Prices, Quota, Credit Burn and How to Choose

Published Updated
AnalysisZhipuGLM Coding PlanBuying GuidePrice ComparisonQuotaPurchase
Summary

Zhipu GLM Coding Plan personal tiers run Lite ¥118, Pro ¥538 and Max ¥1078/mo with 20% off quarterly and 30% off annual; team plans start at ¥598/seat/mo. Quota is credit-based: Lite gets 2,000 credits/5h and 10,000/week, Pro 12,000/60,000, Max 28,000/140,000. GLM-5.3 burns credits at Input 6.9 / Output 24, about 50% more than GLM-4.7. This guide covers where to buy, how credits burn, and which tier fits your workload.

How to buy Zhipu GLM Coding Plan: personal tiers run Lite ¥118, Pro ¥538 and Max ¥1078/mo with 20% off quarterly and 30% off annual, and team plans start at ¥598/seat/mo. Most individual developers should pick Pro — 12,000 credits/5h and 60,000/week is about 6x Lite and covers daily high-frequency development; light trials fit Lite, and Max only makes sense for multi-project or heavy agent workloads. This guide walks through the purchase path, every tier's price and its credit quota, with a selection verdict at the end.

Where to Buy: Official Entry and Purchase Flow

There is only one entry: the GLM Coding product page (bigmodel.cn/glm-coding), where both personal and team plans start (source). The flow is three steps: pick a tier, subscribe and pay, then grab the Coding-specific API key from the console. Personal plans support continuous monthly, quarterly and annual billing; team plans bill per seat monthly or annually.

This key is a separate system from the Zhipu API Open Platform pay-as-you-go key: the Coding key works only inside officially supported coding tools (Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, TRAE and 20+ more), configured with a Coding-specific base URL (Claude Code uses https://open.bigmodel.cn/api/anthropic). For self-hosted backends, use the Open Platform API key — don't point a Coding key at them.

Pricing and Quota: All Tiers Compared

The price comparison verdict: 20% off quarterly, 30% off annual — annual is cheapest, with Lite working out to ¥82.6/mo (source). Personal list prices:

Tier Monthly Quarterly (20% off) Annual (30% off)
Lite ¥118 ¥94.4/mo ¥82.6/mo
Pro ¥538 ¥430.4/mo ¥376.6/mo
Max ¥1078 ¥862.4/mo ¥754.6/mo

Annual is paid up front (Lite ¥991.2/yr, Pro ¥4,519.2/yr, Max ¥9,055.2/yr). Month-to-month makes sense for a short trial; if you're staying long-term, go annual and save 30% — the most concrete deal available.

Quota does not bill by token — it uses a credit system with quota issued on 5-hour and weekly cycles. Personal credit quota:

Tier 5-hour credits Weekly credits vs Lite
Lite 2,000 10,000 Baseline
Pro 12,000 60,000 6x
Max 28,000 140,000 14x

Once quota is exhausted it resets on the next cycle without auto-charging your balance. Off-peak hours (outside Mon–Fri 14:00–18:00 UTC+8) burn model calls at 50% of base credits — evenings and weekends stretch your quota much further.

Credit Coefficients: What GLM-5.3 / 5-Turbo / 4.7 Actually Burn

Within the same plan, the model you pick decides your burn rate — GLM-5.3 is the most expensive, with output 50% pricier than GLM-4.7. The three available models:

Model Input Cached Output Notes
GLM-5.3 6.9 1.7 24 Flagship, first choice for complex engineering
GLM-5-Turbo 5.7 1.5 21 Middle ground for long chains
GLM-4.7 4.6 1.2 16 Daily workhorse, cheapest

For the same 1M output tokens, GLM-5.3 burns 24 credits while GLM-4.7 burns 16. The practical combo: GLM-4.7 for daily Q&A and small-repo iteration, GLM-5.3 for complex agentic coding and terminal work. Web search, page reading and open-repo MCP each cost a flat 1.2 credits, sharing the same pool as model calls.

Team vs Personal: Where They Diverge

Team plans meter independent credits per seat and target teams that need multi-user management and unified billing; personal plans are one person, one quota. The two team tiers:

Tier Monthly Annual (10% off) Credits per seat (5h/week)
Standard ¥598/seat ¥538.2/seat 15,000 / 66,000
Advanced ¥1198/seat ¥1078.2/seat 35,000 / 155,000

Two seats minimum. Team plans include seat and permission management, usage dashboards, consolidated billing and invoicing, and data not used for training by default; exhausted quota can enable overage billing at 90% of API list price (limited promo, admin-enabled). The purchasing admin does not occupy a seat by default.

How to Choose: Decision by Scenario

Three direct verdicts — match your workload and go.

  1. Light trial, small repos, occasional Q&A → Lite (¥118/mo). 2,000/5h handles light iteration; use it to validate whether the GLM + MCP workflow fits you.
  2. Daily high-frequency individual development with a stable search-read-edit loop → Pro (¥538/mo). The officially highlighted tier: 12,000/5h and 60,000/week is about 6x Lite, with official guidance supporting 1–2 parallel project-level agent workflows.
  3. Multi-project, large repos, heavy agent workloads → Max (¥1078/mo). 28,000/5h and 140,000/week is about 14x Lite, with peak-time resource priority.

For teams: Standard covers daily work on medium repos; Advanced fits high-concurrency, multi-project work that needs peak-time guarantees. And run the monthly-vs-annual math before buying — annual saves 30% for long-term users.

Caveats

  1. Plans work only inside officially supported tools; seat sharing or unsupported tools may trigger risk controls.
  2. GLM-5.3 weights aren't open-sourced yet (Z.ai targets late August), so third-party tooling may shift.
  3. Legacy GLM-5.2/5.1 calls auto-route to GLM-5.3 — if you budgeted by GLM-4.7 coefficients, the same tokens now burn more credits.

Sources and verification

Last verified

Zhipu Token Plan FAQ

How do the Zhipu GLM Coding Plan personal Lite, Pro and Max tiers differ in price and credit quota, and which one should I pick?

Monthly pricing is Lite ¥118, Pro ¥538 and Max ¥1078, with 20% off quarterly and 30% off annual. Quota is credit-based: Lite gets 2,000 credits/5h and 10,000/week, Pro 12,000/60,000, Max 28,000/140,000. Pro is the officially highlighted tier at about 6x Lite quota and fits most frequent individual developers; Lite suits light trials, while Max fits multi-project or heavy agent workloads.

Where is the official entry to buy the Zhipu GLM Coding Plan, and how does the purchase flow differ between personal and team plans?

The official entry is the GLM Coding product page (bigmodel.cn/glm-coding); both personal and team plans start there. After subscribing, get a Coding-specific API key from the console and configure the Coding base URL when connecting Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and similar tools. Team plans are purchased per seat — Standard ¥598/seat/mo and Advanced ¥1198/seat/mo, 2 seats minimum.

How does credit burn work on the GLM Coding Plan, and how do the GLM-5.3, GLM-5-Turbo and GLM-4.7 credit coefficients differ?

GLM Coding Plan bills by credits: GLM-5.3 burns Input 6.9 / Cached 1.7 / Output 24, GLM-5-Turbo 5.7 / 1.5 / 21, and GLM-4.7 4.6 / 1.2 / 16. For the same 1M output tokens, GLM-5.3 costs 24 credits versus GLM-4.7's 16 — 50% more. Use GLM-4.7 for daily coding and switch to GLM-5.3 for hard tasks to slow your credit burn.

What happens when my GLM Coding Plan quota runs out, and how do off-peak hours and cache hits save credits?

Personal plans pause until the next reset (5-hour or weekly cycle) and never auto-charge account balance. Model calls burn at 50% of base credits off-peak (outside Mon–Fri 14:00–18:00 UTC+8); GLM-5.3 cache hits cost only 1.7 credits, so long chats and fixed system prompts save a lot. Team plans can enable overage at 90% of API list price.

What is the difference between GLM Coding Plan team and personal plans, and how do I choose between team Standard and Advanced?

Team plans bill per seat with independent credits (Standard 15,000/5h and 66,000/week; Advanced 35,000/5h and 155,000/week), plus seat and permission management, usage dashboards, consolidated billing and data not used for training by default. Two seats minimum, 10% off annual. Team and personal quota are separate, and the purchasing admin does not occupy a seat by default. Pick Advanced for heavier parallel workloads and peak-time priority.
AI Token Plan

Global AI Token Comparison

AI Token Plan is not just a collection of vendor links. It places 41+ domestic and international AI platforms into one comparison framework, covering 395+ model entries plus common plan types such as Token Plans, Coding Plans, IDE Tools and LLM APIs.

When you need to compare AI subscription pricing, coding plan quota, API usage cost or official deal entry points, AI Token Plan brings official prices, plan tiers, usage rules, model capabilities and tool integrations into one place, reducing the need to check multiple vendor sites manually.

Data is continuously organized as vendor pricing pages, plan pages and product documentation change, making the homepage a pricing comparison entry point while detail pages explain whether each vendor plan fits individual developers, team purchasing or long-term API usage.

Prices come from each platform's official site and may change at any time; the official price prevails.

© 2026 AI Token Plan · All rights reserved · First published June 18, 2026 · 64 days running · Sitemap